排名
最低EV/EBITDA — Technology
企业价值与息税折旧摊销前利润之比。较低可能意味着低估。
共 156 家公司有EV/EBITDA数据。
按EV/EBITDA排名(156)
| # | 代码 | 名称 | 市值 | EV/EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GTEC | $13M | 0.5 | |
| 2 | VYX | $949M | 1.0 | |
| 3 | CBAT | $73M | 3.0 | |
| 4 | HY | $666M | 3.4 | |
| 5 | DTI | $102M | 4.1 | |
| 6 | HELE | $400M | 4.9 | |
| 7 | HPQ | $17.4B | 5.8 | |
| 8 | CTLP | $799M | 6.3 | |
| 9 | ARTW | $14M | 6.3 | |
| 10 | NNBR | $79M | 6.6 | |
| 11 | WFRD | $7.1B | 7.5 | |
| 12 | KTCC | $29M | 7.6 | |
| 13 | MTW | $482M | 7.6 | |
| 14 | WHR | $3.6B | 7.7 | |
| 15 | PBI | $1.7B | 8.4 | |
| 16 | NOV | $6.9B | 8.7 | |
| 17 | LNN | $1.2B | 8.8 | |
| 18 | AGCO | $8.9B | 8.8 | |
| 19 | AP | $183M | 8.9 | |
| 20 | SPB | $1.9B | 9.6 | |
| 21 | TNC | $1.4B | 9.8 | |
| 22 | INVX | $1.8B | 9.9 | |
| 23 | QCOM | $141.7B | 10.1 | |
| 24 | NATL | $3.3B | 10.1 | |
| 25 | SWKS | $8.6B | 10.1 | |
| 26 | MIDD | $6.7B | 10.5 | |
| 27 | DBD | $3.0B | 10.8 | |
| 28 | CMCO | $463M | 10.9 | |
| 29 | ALG | $2.1B | 11.0 | |
| 30 | FSLR | $21.6B | 11.0 | |
| 31 | CNH | $14.3B | 11.1 | |
| 32 | AOS | $9.3B | 11.3 | |
| 33 | HPE | $32.5B | 11.6 | |
| 34 | KMT | $3.0B | 12.0 | |
| 35 | SMCI | $16.3B | 12.1 | |
| 36 | NTAP | $19.5B | 12.2 | |
| 37 | TKR | $7.5B | 12.4 | |
| 38 | VSH | $3.1B | 12.4 | |
| 39 | GTES | $6.7B | 12.4 | |
| 40 | EPAC | $1.9B | 12.8 | |
| 41 | ULBI | $124M | 12.9 | |
| 42 | AMKR | $15.2B | 13.2 | |
| 43 | OIS | $673M | 13.2 | |
| 44 | PLOW | $1.1B | 13.3 | |
| 45 | AYI | $8.6B | 13.5 | |
| 46 | PPIH | $286M | 14.0 | |
| 47 | HLIT | $1.1B | 14.1 | |
| 48 | BHE | $2.3B | 14.1 | |
| 49 | DE | $161.0B | 14.3 | |
| 50 | TEX | $7.2B | 14.5 | |
| 51 | TWIN | $260M | 14.5 | |
| 52 | DELL | $119.1B | 14.6 | |
| 53 | BKR | $61.0B | 14.7 | |
| 54 | ESAB | $6.3B | 14.9 | |
| 55 | ZBRA | $11.0B | 15.1 | |
| 56 | LYTS | $706M | 15.4 | |
| 57 | PAR | $545M | 15.6 | |
| 58 | MEI | $262M | 15.7 | |
| 59 | FTI | $28.8B | 15.8 | |
| 60 | NXPI | $53.0B | 16.1 | |
| 61 | CMI | $85.1B | 16.4 | |
| 62 | FLS | $10.4B | 16.7 | |
| 63 | DOV | $29.5B | 16.7 | |
| 64 | LII | $18.1B | 16.9 | |
| 65 | SANM | $8.4B | 17.0 | |
| 66 | OTIS | $31.8B | 17.1 | |
| 67 | HAYW | $3.2B | 17.2 | |
| 68 | TTC | $9.5B | 17.3 | |
| 69 | FELE | $4.6B | 17.3 | |
| 70 | TRT | $61M | 17.5 | |
| 71 | DCI | $10.3B | 17.5 | |
| 72 | OMCL | $1.7B | 17.6 | |
| 73 | JBL | $32.3B | 17.9 | |
| 74 | DIOD | $4.0B | 18.0 | |
| 75 | FLEX | $29.5B | 18.4 | |
| 76 | GGG | $14.5B | 18.5 | |
| 77 | CARR | $54.0B | 18.5 | |
| 78 | KAI | $3.9B | 18.6 | |
| 79 | PNR | $14.7B | 18.7 | |
| 80 | ITW | $78.4B | 18.9 | |
| 81 | XYL | $31.2B | 19.0 | |
| 82 | ESE | $8.2B | 19.4 | |
| 83 | GRC | $1.9B | 19.9 | |
| 84 | ACMR | $3.3B | 20.5 | |
| 85 | LECO | $14.4B | 20.8 | |
| 86 | IEX | $15.2B | 21.2 | |
| 87 | PLXS | $6.1B | 21.2 | |
| 88 | RRX | $13.9B | 21.3 | |
| 89 | HUBB | $28.9B | 21.8 | |
| 90 | OSIS | $4.9B | 22.2 | |
| 91 | MOG-A | $10.0B | 22.2 | |
| 92 | NDSN | $15.6B | 22.3 | |
| 93 | MITK | $657M | 22.4 | |
| 94 | PSIX | $2.0B | 22.4 | |
| 95 | ITT | $19.8B | 22.5 | |
| 96 | VECO | $2.5B | 22.6 | |
| 97 | MSI | $73.1B | 22.6 | |
| 98 | UEIC | $55M | 23.6 | |
| 99 | NVT | $21.7B | 23.8 | |
| 100 | EMR | $81.2B | 24.4 |
如何把排名页用到估值流程里
先看公司页
先确认商业模式、利润率、资本结构和当前估值倍数,避免只看单一排名就下结论。
再验证 WACC
倍数看起来便宜,不代表折现率合理。先验证资本成本,再决定 DCF 假设。
最后进入 DCF
用同一家公司对应的 DCF 页面验证合理价值区间,避免排名、倍数和现金流假设互相脱节。
其他板块 EV/EBITDA 排名
数据每日更新 · 来源: SEC EDGAR, Polygon.io