排名
最低EV/EBITDA — Industrials
企业价值与息税折旧摊销前利润之比。较低可能意味着低估。
共 179 家公司有EV/EBITDA数据。
按EV/EBITDA排名(179)
| # | 代码 | 名称 | 市值 | EV/EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GTEC | $13M | 0.5 | |
| 2 | VYX | $949M | 1.0 | |
| 3 | VIRC | $96M | 2.1 | |
| 4 | HY | $666M | 3.4 | |
| 5 | GTLS | $10.0B | 3.9 | |
| 6 | DTI | $102M | 4.1 | |
| 7 | AMWD | $614M | 4.9 | |
| 8 | HPQ | $17.4B | 5.8 | |
| 9 | SNBR | $41M | 5.9 | |
| 10 | CTLP | $799M | 6.3 | |
| 11 | ARTW | $14M | 6.3 | |
| 12 | JBI | $778M | 6.3 | |
| 13 | NNBR | $79M | 6.6 | |
| 14 | UFPI | $5.5B | 6.7 | |
| 15 | VATE | $131M | 7.4 | |
| 16 | WFRD | $7.1B | 7.5 | |
| 17 | KOP | $743M | 7.5 | |
| 18 | MTW | $482M | 7.6 | |
| 19 | THO | $4.1B | 7.7 | |
| 20 | PKOH | $384M | 8.1 | |
| 21 | APTV | $12.6B | 8.3 | |
| 22 | PBI | $1.7B | 8.4 | |
| 23 | TRN | $2.8B | 8.4 | |
| 24 | FBIN | $4.9B | 8.5 | |
| 25 | OSK | $9.5B | 8.5 | |
| 26 | NOV | $6.9B | 8.7 | |
| 27 | GEF | $3.9B | 8.8 | |
| 28 | LNN | $1.2B | 8.8 | |
| 29 | AGCO | $8.9B | 8.8 | |
| 30 | AP | $183M | 8.9 | |
| 31 | ACU | $172M | 9.0 | |
| 32 | CXT | $2.6B | 9.0 | |
| 33 | HLMN | $1.7B | 9.3 | |
| 34 | HNI | $2.6B | 9.3 | |
| 35 | LCUT | $168M | 9.4 | |
| 36 | DAN | $4.0B | 9.5 | |
| 37 | SLGN | $4.4B | 9.7 | |
| 38 | TNC | $1.4B | 9.8 | |
| 39 | INVX | $1.8B | 9.9 | |
| 40 | MBC | $1.1B | 10.1 | |
| 41 | NATL | $3.3B | 10.1 | |
| 42 | MIDD | $6.7B | 10.5 | |
| 43 | LCII | $3.1B | 10.7 | |
| 44 | BALL | $16.9B | 10.8 | |
| 45 | DBD | $3.0B | 10.8 | |
| 46 | CMCO | $463M | 10.9 | |
| 47 | ALG | $2.1B | 11.0 | |
| 48 | CNH | $14.3B | 11.1 | |
| 49 | PATK | $3.7B | 11.1 | |
| 50 | WGO | $943M | 11.2 | |
| 51 | MAS | $13.2B | 11.6 | |
| 52 | HPE | $32.5B | 11.6 | |
| 53 | MLKN | $1.1B | 11.7 | |
| 54 | KMT | $3.0B | 12.0 | |
| 55 | SMCI | $16.3B | 12.1 | |
| 56 | NTAP | $19.5B | 12.2 | |
| 57 | GM | $71.8B | 12.3 | |
| 58 | TKR | $7.5B | 12.4 | |
| 59 | GTES | $6.7B | 12.4 | |
| 60 | TREX | $4.3B | 12.5 | |
| 61 | CCK | $12.0B | 12.7 | |
| 62 | EPAC | $1.9B | 12.8 | |
| 63 | SWK | $11.2B | 13.1 | |
| 64 | OIS | $673M | 13.2 | |
| 65 | SNA | $19.7B | 13.2 | |
| 66 | PLOW | $1.1B | 13.3 | |
| 67 | AYI | $8.6B | 13.5 | |
| 68 | PPIH | $286M | 14.0 | |
| 69 | DE | $161.0B | 14.3 | |
| 70 | SSD | $7.3B | 14.4 | |
| 71 | VMI | $8.4B | 14.4 | |
| 72 | TEX | $7.2B | 14.5 | |
| 73 | TWIN | $260M | 14.5 | |
| 74 | HII | $15.7B | 14.5 | |
| 75 | DELL | $119.1B | 14.6 | |
| 76 | BKR | $61.0B | 14.7 | |
| 77 | MWA | $4.7B | 14.8 | |
| 78 | SMP | $839M | 14.8 | |
| 79 | ESAB | $6.3B | 14.9 | |
| 80 | AZZ | $4.1B | 14.9 | |
| 81 | ZBRA | $11.0B | 15.1 | |
| 82 | LPX | $5.3B | 15.1 | |
| 83 | GD | $92.1B | 15.2 | |
| 84 | LYTS | $706M | 15.4 | |
| 85 | PAR | $545M | 15.6 | |
| 86 | FTI | $28.8B | 15.8 | |
| 87 | TRS | $1.4B | 15.8 | |
| 88 | FGI | $8M | 16.3 | |
| 89 | CMI | $85.1B | 16.4 | |
| 90 | FLS | $10.4B | 16.7 | |
| 91 | DOV | $29.5B | 16.7 | |
| 92 | LII | $18.1B | 16.9 | |
| 93 | HAYW | $3.2B | 17.2 | |
| 94 | TTC | $9.5B | 17.3 | |
| 95 | FELE | $4.6B | 17.3 | |
| 96 | TRT | $61M | 17.5 | |
| 97 | SIF | $98M | 17.5 | |
| 98 | DCI | $10.3B | 17.5 | |
| 99 | OMCL | $1.7B | 17.6 | |
| 100 | HLIO | $2.4B | 17.9 |
如何把排名页用到估值流程里
先看公司页
先确认商业模式、利润率、资本结构和当前估值倍数，避免只看单一排名就下结论。
再验证 WACC
倍数看起来便宜，不代表折现率合理。先验证资本成本，再决定 DCF 假设。
最后进入 DCF
用同一家公司对应的 DCF 页面验证合理价值区间，避免排名、倍数和现金流假设互相脱节。
其他板块 EV/EBITDA 排名
数据每日更新 · 来源: SEC EDGAR, Polygon.io