RANKINGS
Highest ROE — Technology
Return on Equity measures how efficiently a company generates profit from shareholder equity.
242 companies with ROE data.
Ranked by ROE(242)
| # | Ticker | Name | Market Cap | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAPL | $3.8T | 151.9% | |
| 2 | FTNT | $58.2B | 116.8% | |
| 3 | NTAP | $19.5B | 114.0% | |
| 4 | PSIX | $2.0B | 106.2% | |
| 5 | VYX | $949M | 102.7% | |
| 6 | ITW | $78.4B | 95.0% | |
| 7 | NVDA | $4.8T | 91.9% | |
| 8 | MSI | $73.1B | 89.4% | |
| 9 | AIRJ | $207M | 85.6% | |
| 10 | LII | $18.1B | 69.3% | |
| 11 | MPWR | $67.0B | 56.8% | |
| 12 | LRCX | $340.2B | 54.3% | |
| 13 | INVE | $88M | 48.6% | |
| 14 | GE | $332.3B | 46.6% | |
| 15 | GEV | $265.5B | 43.7% | |
| 16 | JBL | $32.3B | 43.4% | |
| 17 | ASML | $585.2B | 42.6% | |
| 18 | CAT | $369.6B | 41.7% | |
| 19 | NATL | $3.3B | 36.5% | |
| 20 | WDC | $124.2B | 35.6% | |
| 21 | LECO | $14.4B | 35.1% | |
| 22 | AMAT | $314.0B | 34.3% | |
| 23 | APH | $182.8B | 31.8% | |
| 24 | TXN | $199.3B | 30.7% | |
| 25 | HY | $666M | 30.0% | |
| 26 | LOGI | $14.1B | 29.7% | |
| 27 | AOS | $9.3B | 29.4% | |
| 28 | FTI | $28.8B | 28.7% | |
| 29 | ANET | $194.0B | 28.4% | |
| 30 | POWL | $8.5B | 28.2% | |
| 31 | BKTI | $355M | 28.0% | |
| 32 | QCOM | $141.7B | 26.1% | |
| 33 | BWXT | $21.8B | 26.1% | |
| 34 | NSSC | $1.6B | 25.7% | |
| 35 | CTLP | $799M | 25.7% | |
| 36 | JCI | $86.9B | 25.5% | |
| 37 | WFRD | $7.1B | 25.4% | |
| 38 | DCI | $10.3B | 25.2% | |
| 39 | NVEC | $371M | 24.2% | |
| 40 | CMI | $85.1B | 23.9% | |
| 41 | GTEC | $13M | 23.4% | |
| 42 | HUBB | $28.9B | 23.1% | |
| 43 | CLS | $44.2B | 22.6% | |
| 44 | IBM | $225.5B | 22.1% | |
| 45 | TTC | $9.5B | 21.8% | |
| 46 | CSCO | $326.3B | 21.7% | |
| 47 | ATEN | $1.8B | 21.6% | |
| 48 | EPAC | $1.9B | 21.4% | |
| 49 | PLOW | $1.1B | 21.3% | |
| 50 | ETN | $155.9B | 20.5% | |
| 51 | AAON | $7.7B | 20.4% | |
| 52 | NXPI | $53.0B | 20.1% | |
| 53 | ACLS | $3.5B | 19.8% | |
| 54 | GGG | $14.5B | 19.7% | |
| 55 | ESE | $8.2B | 19.4% | |
| 56 | DE | $161.0B | 19.4% | |
| 57 | FFIV | $16.7B | 19.3% | |
| 58 | CW | $27.4B | 19.1% | |
| 59 | NVT | $21.7B | 19.0% | |
| 60 | IMMR | $192M | 18.6% | |
| 61 | PNR | $14.7B | 17.6% | |
| 62 | WHD | $3.7B | 17.3% | |
| 63 | WWD | $24.0B | 17.2% | |
| 64 | CRUS | $8.2B | 17.0% | |
| 65 | AGCO | $8.9B | 17.0% | |
| 66 | RMBS | $13.2B | 16.9% | |
| 67 | FLEX | $29.5B | 16.8% | |
| 68 | SMCI | $16.3B | 16.6% | |
| 69 | FSLR | $21.6B | 16.2% | |
| 70 | CNH | $14.3B | 16.2% | |
| 71 | ESP | $182M | 16.0% | |
| 72 | NDSN | $15.6B | 15.9% | |
| 73 | FLS | $10.4B | 15.8% | |
| 74 | MU | $525.1B | 15.8% | |
| 75 | OSIS | $4.9B | 15.7% | |
| 76 | TAYD | $163M | 15.2% | |
| 77 | DOV | $29.5B | 14.8% | |
| 78 | INVX | $1.8B | 14.6% | |
| 79 | AYI | $8.6B | 14.6% | |
| 80 | PANW | $131.0B | 14.5% | |
| 81 | SPXC | $11.3B | 14.5% | |
| 82 | LNN | $1.2B | 13.9% | |
| 83 | OLED | $4.6B | 13.7% | |
| 84 | BKR | $61.0B | 13.7% | |
| 85 | TNC | $1.4B | 13.5% | |
| 86 | CRCT | $896M | 13.5% | |
| 87 | SONY | $123.8B | 13.4% | |
| 88 | KAI | $3.9B | 13.2% | |
| 89 | PPIH | $286M | 12.5% | |
| 90 | ZWS | $8.3B | 12.3% | |
| 91 | IEX | $15.2B | 12.0% | |
| 92 | ITT | $19.8B | 11.9% | |
| 93 | PLXS | $6.1B | 11.9% | |
| 94 | MOG-A | $10.0B | 11.8% | |
| 95 | MIDD | $6.7B | 11.8% | |
| 96 | ZBRA | $11.0B | 11.7% | |
| 97 | WHR | $3.6B | 11.7% | |
| 98 | ACMR | $3.3B | 11.5% | |
| 99 | ALG | $2.1B | 11.4% | |
| 100 | BELFA | $2.8B | 11.4% |
How to turn this ranking into valuation work
Start with the company page
Validate business quality, margins, capital structure, and the current valuation context before relying on a single multiple.
Then validate WACC
A cheap multiple does not guarantee a sensible discount rate. Check cost of capital before finalizing DCF assumptions.
Finish with DCF
Use the matching DCF page to test intrinsic value so multiples, discount rates, and cash-flow assumptions stay connected.
ROE Rankings in Other Sectors
Data updated daily · Source: SEC EDGAR, Polygon.io