RANKINGS
Lowest P/B — Technology
Price-to-Book ratio compares market value to book value. Lower may signal value.
242 companies with P/B Ratio data.
Ranked by P/B Ratio(242)
| # | Ticker | Name | Market Cap | P/B Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WETH | $18M | 0.1 | |
| 2 | XRX | $184M | 0.2 | |
| 3 | GTEC | $13M | 0.2 | |
| 4 | HELE | $400M | 0.2 | |
| 5 | KTCC | $29M | 0.2 | |
| 6 | TRNR | $2M | 0.3 | |
| 7 | CLRO | $7M | 0.3 | |
| 8 | UEIC | $55M | 0.4 | |
| 9 | MEI | $262M | 0.4 | |
| 10 | SCKT | $7M | 0.4 | |
| 11 | MSN | $9M | 0.4 | |
| 12 | CMCO | $463M | 0.5 | |
| 13 | CVR | $11M | 0.5 | |
| 14 | INVE | $88M | 0.6 | |
| 15 | FCEL | $387M | 0.6 | |
| 16 | CBAT | $73M | 0.6 | |
| 17 | PAR | $545M | 0.6 | |
| 18 | AZTA | $1.1B | 0.6 | |
| 19 | MTW | $482M | 0.7 | |
| 20 | AIRJ | $207M | 0.8 | |
| 21 | DTI | $102M | 0.9 | |
| 22 | ULBI | $124M | 0.9 | |
| 23 | SPB | $1.9B | 1.0 | |
| 24 | FTEK | $41M | 1.0 | |
| 25 | OIS | $673M | 1.0 | |
| 26 | VYX | $949M | 1.0 | |
| 27 | ARTW | $14M | 1.0 | |
| 28 | IMMR | $192M | 1.0 | |
| 29 | GENC | $223M | 1.1 | |
| 30 | NNBR | $79M | 1.1 | |
| 31 | CRSR | $654M | 1.1 | |
| 32 | NOV | $6.9B | 1.1 | |
| 33 | LIQT | $19M | 1.1 | |
| 34 | CVV | $29M | 1.1 | |
| 35 | TACT | $35M | 1.1 | |
| 36 | LGL | $45M | 1.1 | |
| 37 | NSYS | $39M | 1.2 | |
| 38 | ALOT | $90M | 1.2 | |
| 39 | KOSS | $37M | 1.2 | |
| 40 | FKWL | $42M | 1.2 | |
| 41 | WHR | $3.6B | 1.3 | |
| 42 | HPE | $32.5B | 1.3 | |
| 43 | OMCL | $1.7B | 1.3 | |
| 44 | NTGR | $678M | 1.4 | |
| 45 | HY | $666M | 1.4 | |
| 46 | CLFD | $378M | 1.5 | |
| 47 | SWKS | $8.6B | 1.5 | |
| 48 | VSH | $3.1B | 1.5 | |
| 49 | NEON | $25M | 1.5 | |
| 50 | TWIN | $260M | 1.6 | |
| 51 | CIIT | $5M | 1.7 | |
| 52 | TRT | $61M | 1.8 | |
| 53 | MIDD | $6.7B | 1.8 | |
| 54 | RR | $499M | 1.8 | |
| 55 | CNH | $14.3B | 1.8 | |
| 56 | INVX | $1.8B | 1.9 | |
| 57 | CRCT | $896M | 1.9 | |
| 58 | DNOW | $2.2B | 2.0 | |
| 59 | GTES | $6.7B | 2.0 | |
| 60 | RRX | $13.9B | 2.0 | |
| 61 | BHE | $2.3B | 2.0 | |
| 62 | AGCO | $8.9B | 2.1 | |
| 63 | FET | $670M | 2.1 | |
| 64 | ALG | $2.1B | 2.1 | |
| 65 | SYNA | $3.0B | 2.1 | |
| 66 | DIOD | $4.0B | 2.1 | |
| 67 | SONY | $123.8B | 2.2 | |
| 68 | LNN | $1.2B | 2.2 | |
| 69 | ASTE | $1.4B | 2.2 | |
| 70 | HAYW | $3.2B | 2.3 | |
| 71 | TNC | $1.4B | 2.3 | |
| 72 | HLIT | $1.1B | 2.3 | |
| 73 | KMT | $3.0B | 2.3 | |
| 74 | TKR | $7.5B | 2.3 | |
| 75 | PLUG | $4.1B | 2.4 | |
| 76 | SMCI | $16.3B | 2.6 | |
| 77 | OLED | $4.6B | 2.6 | |
| 78 | IPGP | $5.3B | 2.6 | |
| 79 | TAYD | $163M | 2.6 | |
| 80 | FSLR | $21.6B | 2.7 | |
| 81 | DBD | $3.0B | 2.7 | |
| 82 | MITK | $657M | 2.7 | |
| 83 | INTC | $320.4B | 2.8 | |
| 84 | EKSO | $36M | 2.8 | |
| 85 | ERII | $596M | 2.8 | |
| 86 | ESAB | $6.3B | 2.9 | |
| 87 | INTZ | $18M | 2.9 | |
| 88 | XYL | $31.2B | 2.9 | |
| 89 | CTS | $1.6B | 3.0 | |
| 90 | ZBRA | $11.0B | 3.1 | |
| 91 | LYTS | $706M | 3.1 | |
| 92 | AP | $183M | 3.1 | |
| 93 | LTRX | $233M | 3.1 | |
| 94 | BC | $5.1B | 3.2 | |
| 95 | AYI | $8.6B | 3.2 | |
| 96 | CTLP | $799M | 3.2 | |
| 97 | VECO | $2.5B | 3.2 | |
| 98 | KN | $2.5B | 3.2 | |
| 99 | BKR | $61.0B | 3.2 | |
| 100 | DGII | $2.1B | 3.3 |
How to turn this ranking into valuation work
Start with the company page
Validate business quality, margins, capital structure, and the current valuation context before relying on a single multiple.
Then validate WACC
A cheap multiple does not guarantee a sensible discount rate. Check cost of capital before finalizing DCF assumptions.
Finish with DCF
Use the matching DCF page to test intrinsic value so multiples, discount rates, and cash-flow assumptions stay connected.
P/B Ratio Rankings in Other Sectors
Data updated daily · Source: SEC EDGAR, Polygon.io