RANKINGS
Lowest P/B — Technology
Price-to-Book ratio compares market value to book value. Lower may signal value.
244 companies with P/B Ratio data.
Ranked by P/B Ratio(244)
| # | Ticker | Name | Market Cap | P/B Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INLF | $203,641.45 | 0.0 | |
| 2 | KUST | $605,922.876 | 0.1 | |
| 3 | WLDS | $3M | 0.2 | |
| 4 | GTEC | $15M | 0.2 | |
| 5 | ZOOZ | $41M | 0.3 | |
| 6 | IMMR | $224M | 0.4 | |
| 7 | KTCC | $43M | 0.4 | |
| 8 | UEIC | $60M | 0.4 | |
| 9 | CVR | $10M | 0.5 | |
| 10 | WPRT | $36M | 0.5 | |
| 11 | LBGJ | $4M | 0.6 | |
| 12 | VISN | $2.7B | 0.6 | |
| 13 | RUN | $3.0B | 0.6 | |
| 14 | MX | $139M | 0.6 | |
| 15 | NEON | $14M | 0.6 | |
| 16 | DTI | $80M | 0.7 | |
| 17 | MTW | $457M | 0.7 | |
| 18 | WHR | $2.5B | 0.7 | |
| 19 | MVST | $325M | 0.7 | |
| 20 | XRX | $362M | 0.7 | |
| 21 | ULBI | $94M | 0.7 | |
| 22 | HTOO | $8M | 0.8 | |
| 23 | AZTA | $1.2B | 0.8 | |
| 24 | SMX | $16M | 0.8 | |
| 25 | SSYS | $720M | 0.9 | |
| 26 | PAR | $709M | 0.9 | |
| 27 | OIS | $510M | 0.9 | |
| 28 | ARTW | $13M | 0.9 | |
| 29 | LGL | $45M | 1.0 | |
| 30 | CYD | $1.7B | 1.0 | |
| 31 | VYX | $1.1B | 1.0 | |
| 32 | AVNW | $273M | 1.0 | |
| 33 | KRNT | $725M | 1.0 | |
| 34 | KE | $593M | 1.0 | |
| 35 | SPB | $1.9B | 1.0 | |
| 36 | BOSC | $30M | 1.0 | |
| 37 | YIBO | $61M | 1.1 | |
| 38 | RR | $362M | 1.1 | |
| 39 | NOV | $6.9B | 1.1 | |
| 40 | NSYS | $38M | 1.1 | |
| 41 | DNOW | $2.4B | 1.1 | |
| 42 | AEBI | $922M | 1.1 | |
| 43 | KOSS | $37M | 1.2 | |
| 44 | HY | $574M | 1.3 | |
| 45 | SCKT | $5M | 1.3 | |
| 46 | SES | $259M | 1.3 | |
| 47 | SYNX | $7M | 1.3 | |
| 48 | FTEK | $50M | 1.3 | |
| 49 | AOSL | $1.0B | 1.3 | |
| 50 | TRSG | $24M | 1.3 | |
| 51 | NTGR | $614M | 1.3 | |
| 52 | BLNK | $78M | 1.4 | |
| 53 | KULR | $137M | 1.4 | |
| 54 | HLP | $87M | 1.5 | |
| 55 | SWKS | $8.8B | 1.5 | |
| 56 | CRSR | $1.0B | 1.5 | |
| 57 | KITT | $7M | 1.5 | |
| 58 | SERV | $493M | 1.6 | |
| 59 | TEX | $7.5B | 1.6 | |
| 60 | HBB | $294M | 1.6 | |
| 61 | JBTM | $7.2B | 1.6 | |
| 62 | LSE | $74M | 1.6 | |
| 63 | CNH | $12.9B | 1.6 | |
| 64 | ALG | $2.0B | 1.7 | |
| 65 | OMCL | $2.1B | 1.7 | |
| 66 | TACT | $55M | 1.7 | |
| 67 | TWIN | $319M | 1.7 | |
| 68 | WOLF | $1.7B | 1.7 | |
| 69 | INVX | $1.8B | 1.7 | |
| 70 | GTES | $6.7B | 1.8 | |
| 71 | AGCO | $8.3B | 1.8 | |
| 72 | CLFD | $445M | 1.8 | |
| 73 | KMT | $2.6B | 1.8 | |
| 74 | HSAI | $2.4B | 1.9 | |
| 75 | ATKR | $2.4B | 1.9 | |
| 76 | ASTE | $1.3B | 1.9 | |
| 77 | ADTN | $1.0B | 2.0 | |
| 78 | RRX | $13.9B | 2.0 | |
| 79 | FET | $572M | 2.0 | |
| 80 | SILC | $245M | 2.1 | |
| 81 | HAYW | $3.4B | 2.1 | |
| 82 | IPGP | $4.4B | 2.1 | |
| 83 | RDCM | $241M | 2.1 | |
| 84 | OLED | $3.6B | 2.1 | |
| 85 | WATT | $93M | 2.2 | |
| 86 | DIOD | $4.2B | 2.2 | |
| 87 | QRVO | $7.4B | 2.2 | |
| 88 | ASTI | $37M | 2.2 | |
| 89 | WHD | $3.7B | 2.3 | |
| 90 | TBCH | $255M | 2.3 | |
| 91 | SMCI | $17.9B | 2.4 | |
| 92 | FSLR | $23.8B | 2.4 | |
| 93 | ESAB | $5.4B | 2.4 | |
| 94 | ERII | $446M | 2.4 | |
| 95 | AIMD | $14M | 2.5 | |
| 96 | LYTS | $872M | 2.5 | |
| 97 | GWH | $24M | 2.5 | |
| 98 | REKR | $87M | 2.5 | |
| 99 | TAYD | $179M | 2.6 | |
| 100 | XYL | $28.8B | 2.6 |
How to turn this ranking into valuation work
Start with the company page
Validate business quality, margins, capital structure, and the current valuation context before relying on a single multiple.
Then validate WACC
A cheap multiple does not guarantee a sensible discount rate. Check cost of capital before finalizing DCF assumptions.
Finish with DCF
Use the matching DCF page to test intrinsic value so multiples, discount rates, and cash-flow assumptions stay connected.
P/B Ratio Rankings in Other Sectors
Data updated daily · Source: SEC EDGAR, Polygon.io