RANKINGS
Lowest P/B — Technology
Price-to-Book ratio compares market value to book value. Lower may signal value.
244 companies with P/B Ratio data.
Ranked by P/B Ratio(244)
| # | Ticker | Name | Market Cap | P/B Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ZOOZ | $2M | 0.0 | |
| 2 | GTEC | $17M | 0.2 | |
| 3 | SMX | $5M | 0.2 | |
| 4 | WLDS | $6M | 0.3 | |
| 5 | KTCC | $38M | 0.4 | |
| 6 | UEIC | $53M | 0.4 | |
| 7 | IMMR | $214M | 0.4 | |
| 8 | MSN | $9M | 0.4 | |
| 9 | LBGJ | $3M | 0.4 | |
| 10 | KUST | $2M | 0.5 | |
| 11 | CMCO | $459M | 0.5 | |
| 12 | WPRT | $35M | 0.5 | |
| 13 | CVR | $9M | 0.5 | |
| 14 | MEI | $409M | 0.6 | |
| 15 | MTW | $425M | 0.6 | |
| 16 | CMTL | $167M | 0.6 | |
| 17 | AZTA | $1.1B | 0.7 | |
| 18 | FLOC | $978M | 0.7 | |
| 19 | WHR | $2.8B | 0.7 | |
| 20 | PAR | $637M | 0.8 | |
| 21 | HELE | $631M | 0.8 | |
| 22 | HLP | $46M | 0.8 | |
| 23 | DTI | $98M | 0.8 | |
| 24 | XRX | $424M | 0.8 | |
| 25 | VYX | $991M | 0.9 | |
| 26 | OIS | $512M | 0.9 | |
| 27 | ULBI | $121M | 0.9 | |
| 28 | GENC | $207M | 1.0 | |
| 29 | SPB | $1.8B | 1.0 | |
| 30 | ARTW | $13M | 1.0 | |
| 31 | LGL | $47M | 1.0 | |
| 32 | BOSC | $29M | 1.0 | |
| 33 | YIBO | $60M | 1.0 | |
| 34 | KRNT | $747M | 1.0 | |
| 35 | SSYS | $915M | 1.1 | |
| 36 | DNOW | $2.3B | 1.1 | |
| 37 | HTOO | $12M | 1.1 | |
| 38 | NOV | $7.2B | 1.1 | |
| 39 | PLAB | $1.9B | 1.2 | |
| 40 | TRSG | $21M | 1.2 | |
| 41 | AEBI | $967M | 1.2 | |
| 42 | FTEK | $46M | 1.2 | |
| 43 | NSYS | $42M | 1.2 | |
| 44 | NEON | $29M | 1.3 | |
| 45 | CYD | $2.1B | 1.3 | |
| 46 | TWIN | $241M | 1.3 | |
| 47 | KOSS | $39M | 1.3 | |
| 48 | SYNX | $8M | 1.4 | |
| 49 | MX | $321M | 1.4 | |
| 50 | TEX | $6.6B | 1.4 | |
| 51 | TACT | $46M | 1.4 | |
| 52 | STAK | $18M | 1.4 | |
| 53 | HY | $651M | 1.4 | |
| 54 | LIQT | $11M | 1.4 | |
| 55 | NTGR | $698M | 1.5 | |
| 56 | OMSE | $200M | 1.5 | |
| 57 | FCEL | $1.1B | 1.5 | |
| 58 | JBTM | $7.0B | 1.6 | |
| 59 | ALOT | $120M | 1.6 | |
| 60 | ALG | $1.8B | 1.6 | |
| 61 | OMCL | $2.0B | 1.6 | |
| 62 | CNH | $12.7B | 1.6 | |
| 63 | LSE | $76M | 1.7 | |
| 64 | ASTE | $1.2B | 1.7 | |
| 65 | GTES | $6.6B | 1.8 | |
| 66 | AGCO | $8.1B | 1.8 | |
| 67 | INVX | $1.8B | 1.8 | |
| 68 | KMT | $2.5B | 1.8 | |
| 69 | CIIT | $5M | 1.8 | |
| 70 | HAYW | $3.1B | 1.9 | |
| 71 | SILC | $230M | 2.0 | |
| 72 | CRSR | $1.3B | 2.0 | |
| 73 | RRX | $13.4B | 2.0 | |
| 74 | RR | $675M | 2.0 | |
| 75 | FET | $568M | 2.0 | |
| 76 | SWKS | $11.7B | 2.0 | |
| 77 | KITT | $9M | 2.1 | |
| 78 | BYRN | $142M | 2.1 | |
| 79 | RDCM | $250M | 2.2 | |
| 80 | SCKT | $8M | 2.2 | |
| 81 | SONY | $127.4B | 2.2 | |
| 82 | LNN | $1.1B | 2.2 | |
| 83 | ERII | $421M | 2.3 | |
| 84 | IPGP | $4.9B | 2.3 | |
| 85 | HPE | $57.1B | 2.3 | |
| 86 | XYL | $26.0B | 2.3 | |
| 87 | HSAI | $3.0B | 2.3 | |
| 88 | TAYD | $164M | 2.3 | |
| 89 | PPIH | $249M | 2.3 | |
| 90 | WHD | $4.0B | 2.4 | |
| 91 | DIOD | $4.8B | 2.5 | |
| 92 | SERV | $796M | 2.5 | |
| 93 | ESAB | $5.6B | 2.5 | |
| 94 | LYTS | $890M | 2.5 | |
| 95 | OLED | $4.3B | 2.5 | |
| 96 | CRCT | $871M | 2.5 | |
| 97 | TKR | $8.9B | 2.6 | |
| 98 | CLFD | $642M | 2.6 | |
| 99 | ADTN | $1.3B | 2.6 | |
| 100 | IR | $28.0B | 2.7 |
How to turn this ranking into valuation work
Start with the company page
Validate business quality, margins, capital structure, and the current valuation context before relying on a single multiple.
Then validate WACC
A cheap multiple does not guarantee a sensible discount rate. Check cost of capital before finalizing DCF assumptions.
Finish with DCF
Use the matching DCF page to test intrinsic value so multiples, discount rates, and cash-flow assumptions stay connected.
P/B Ratio Rankings in Other Sectors
Data updated daily · Source: SEC EDGAR, Polygon.io