RANKINGS
Lowest P/S — Technology
Price-to-Sales ratio measures valuation relative to revenue.
250 companies with P/S Ratio data.
Ranked by P/S Ratio(250)
| # | Ticker | Name | Market Cap | P/S Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INLF | $203,641.45 | 0.0 | |
| 2 | KUST | $605,922.876 | 0.0 | |
| 3 | XRX | $362M | 0.0 | |
| 4 | KTCC | $43M | 0.1 | |
| 5 | IMMR | $224M | 0.1 | |
| 6 | HY | $574M | 0.2 | |
| 7 | GTEC | $15M | 0.2 | |
| 8 | WHR | $2.5B | 0.2 | |
| 9 | UEIC | $60M | 0.2 | |
| 10 | MTW | $457M | 0.2 | |
| 11 | EAF | $148M | 0.3 | |
| 12 | SCKT | $5M | 0.3 | |
| 13 | FLUX | $16M | 0.3 | |
| 14 | NSYS | $38M | 0.3 | |
| 15 | CVR | $10M | 0.3 | |
| 16 | YIBO | $61M | 0.4 | |
| 17 | LBGJ | $4M | 0.4 | |
| 18 | KE | $593M | 0.4 | |
| 19 | VYX | $1.1B | 0.4 | |
| 20 | HBB | $294M | 0.5 | |
| 21 | ULBI | $94M | 0.5 | |
| 22 | DTI | $80M | 0.5 | |
| 23 | ARTW | $13M | 0.5 | |
| 24 | SMCI | $17.9B | 0.5 | |
| 25 | AEBI | $922M | 0.5 | |
| 26 | BOSC | $30M | 0.6 | |
| 27 | NNBR | $264M | 0.6 | |
| 28 | CYD | $1.7B | 0.6 | |
| 29 | AVNW | $273M | 0.6 | |
| 30 | SPB | $1.9B | 0.7 | |
| 31 | CRSR | $1.0B | 0.7 | |
| 32 | DNOW | $2.4B | 0.7 | |
| 33 | FET | $572M | 0.7 | |
| 34 | BLNK | $78M | 0.8 | |
| 35 | NATL | $3.4B | 0.8 | |
| 36 | DBD | $3.0B | 0.8 | |
| 37 | MX | $139M | 0.8 | |
| 38 | OIS | $510M | 0.8 | |
| 39 | SYNX | $7M | 0.8 | |
| 40 | NOV | $6.9B | 0.8 | |
| 41 | AGCO | $8.3B | 0.8 | |
| 42 | INSG | $135M | 0.8 | |
| 43 | CNH | $12.9B | 0.8 | |
| 44 | ATKR | $2.4B | 0.8 | |
| 45 | TBCH | $255M | 0.9 | |
| 46 | ASTE | $1.3B | 0.9 | |
| 47 | MVST | $325M | 0.9 | |
| 48 | TWIN | $319M | 0.9 | |
| 49 | NTGR | $614M | 0.9 | |
| 50 | ADTN | $1.0B | 0.9 | |
| 51 | BC | $5.0B | 0.9 | |
| 52 | RUN | $3.0B | 0.9 | |
| 53 | SANM | $10.8B | 1.0 | |
| 54 | PSIX | $742M | 1.0 | |
| 55 | TACT | $55M | 1.0 | |
| 56 | BHE | $2.9B | 1.1 | |
| 57 | WFRD | $5.8B | 1.2 | |
| 58 | TNC | $1.5B | 1.2 | |
| 59 | KMT | $2.6B | 1.2 | |
| 60 | ALG | $2.0B | 1.2 | |
| 61 | SONO | $1.8B | 1.2 | |
| 62 | KITT | $7M | 1.2 | |
| 63 | TEX | $7.5B | 1.3 | |
| 64 | SSYS | $720M | 1.3 | |
| 65 | PBI | $2.5B | 1.3 | |
| 66 | CRCT | $949M | 1.3 | |
| 67 | LYTS | $872M | 1.4 | |
| 68 | AIRG | $75M | 1.5 | |
| 69 | PLOW | $996M | 1.5 | |
| 70 | PAR | $709M | 1.5 | |
| 71 | AOSL | $1.0B | 1.5 | |
| 72 | TRSG | $24M | 1.5 | |
| 73 | LSE | $74M | 1.5 | |
| 74 | WPRT | $36M | 1.6 | |
| 75 | LIQT | $26M | 1.6 | |
| 76 | SKYX | $157M | 1.7 | |
| 77 | PLXS | $6.9B | 1.7 | |
| 78 | OMCL | $2.1B | 1.7 | |
| 79 | REKR | $87M | 1.8 | |
| 80 | INVX | $1.8B | 1.8 | |
| 81 | ESAB | $5.4B | 1.9 | |
| 82 | JBTM | $7.2B | 1.9 | |
| 83 | FLS | $8.7B | 1.9 | |
| 84 | FTEK | $50M | 1.9 | |
| 85 | OTIS | $28.2B | 1.9 | |
| 86 | GTES | $6.7B | 1.9 | |
| 87 | OSIS | $3.5B | 1.9 | |
| 88 | LTRX | $237M | 2.0 | |
| 89 | AZTA | $1.2B | 2.0 | |
| 90 | VSH | $6.4B | 2.0 | |
| 91 | QRVO | $7.4B | 2.0 | |
| 92 | BKR | $57.2B | 2.1 | |
| 93 | TKR | $9.6B | 2.1 | |
| 94 | FELE | $4.6B | 2.1 | |
| 95 | VISN | $2.7B | 2.1 | |
| 96 | UCTT | $4.4B | 2.1 | |
| 97 | SYM | $5.4B | 2.1 | |
| 98 | AOS | $8.2B | 2.2 | |
| 99 | SWKS | $8.8B | 2.2 | |
| 100 | RRX | $13.9B | 2.3 |
How to turn this ranking into valuation work
Start with the company page
Validate business quality, margins, capital structure, and the current valuation context before relying on a single multiple.
Then validate WACC
A cheap multiple does not guarantee a sensible discount rate. Check cost of capital before finalizing DCF assumptions.
Finish with DCF
Use the matching DCF page to test intrinsic value so multiples, discount rates, and cash-flow assumptions stay connected.
P/S Ratio Rankings in Other Sectors
Data updated daily · Source: SEC EDGAR, Polygon.io