RANKINGS
Lowest EV/EBITDA — Technology
Enterprise Value to EBITDA. Lower ratios may indicate undervaluation.
139 companies with EV/EBITDA data.
Ranked by EV/EBITDA(139)
| # | Ticker | Name | Market Cap | EV/EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IMMR | $224M | 3.4 | |
| 2 | BOSC | $30M | 4.0 | |
| 3 | VYX | $1.1B | 4.3 | |
| 4 | ARTW | $13M | 5.2 | |
| 5 | TWIN | $319M | 5.5 | |
| 6 | WFRD | $5.8B | 6.2 | |
| 7 | HBB | $294M | 6.4 | |
| 8 | PSIX | $742M | 6.5 | |
| 9 | MTW | $457M | 7.4 | |
| 10 | NATL | $3.4B | 7.7 | |
| 11 | KE | $593M | 7.7 | |
| 12 | WHR | $2.5B | 8.0 | |
| 13 | UEIC | $60M | 8.0 | |
| 14 | AGCO | $8.3B | 8.3 | |
| 15 | KMT | $2.6B | 8.5 | |
| 16 | QCOM | $193.9B | 8.8 | |
| 17 | SPB | $1.9B | 8.9 | |
| 18 | FSLR | $23.8B | 9.4 | |
| 19 | DBD | $3.0B | 9.7 | |
| 20 | PBI | $2.5B | 9.8 | |
| 21 | NOV | $6.9B | 9.9 | |
| 22 | INVX | $1.8B | 10.0 | |
| 23 | FET | $572M | 10.2 | |
| 24 | AOS | $8.2B | 10.9 | |
| 25 | BKR | $57.2B | 11.4 | |
| 26 | ALG | $2.0B | 11.5 | |
| 27 | AVNW | $273M | 11.6 | |
| 28 | SWKS | $8.8B | 11.9 | |
| 29 | SMCI | $17.9B | 12.4 | |
| 30 | QRVO | $7.4B | 12.5 | |
| 31 | FIEE | $35M | 12.6 | |
| 32 | GTES | $6.7B | 12.6 | |
| 33 | ADTN | $1.0B | 13.0 | |
| 34 | ESAB | $5.4B | 13.3 | |
| 35 | AEBI | $922M | 13.3 | |
| 36 | AMKR | $16.4B | 13.4 | |
| 37 | PLOW | $996M | 13.7 | |
| 38 | FLS | $8.7B | 14.1 | |
| 39 | NSYS | $38M | 14.4 | |
| 40 | OTIS | $28.2B | 14.8 | |
| 41 | TKR | $9.6B | 14.9 | |
| 42 | FTI | $29.1B | 14.9 | |
| 43 | ASTE | $1.3B | 15.2 | |
| 44 | NNBR | $264M | 15.4 | |
| 45 | GGG | $12.3B | 15.5 | |
| 46 | HAYW | $3.4B | 15.6 | |
| 47 | PNR | $12.4B | 15.7 | |
| 48 | ATKR | $2.4B | 15.8 | |
| 49 | DOV | $28.9B | 16.2 | |
| 50 | XRX | $362M | 16.3 | |
| 51 | CNH | $12.9B | 16.3 | |
| 52 | XYL | $28.8B | 16.5 | |
| 53 | TEX | $7.5B | 16.8 | |
| 54 | DIOD | $4.2B | 16.8 | |
| 55 | NXPI | $70.3B | 17.0 | |
| 56 | KAI | $3.4B | 17.1 | |
| 57 | FELE | $4.6B | 17.2 | |
| 58 | LECO | $13.8B | 17.3 | |
| 59 | TNC | $1.5B | 17.4 | |
| 60 | KTCC | $43M | 17.6 | |
| 61 | OSIS | $3.5B | 17.7 | |
| 62 | SEI | $4.1B | 17.7 | |
| 63 | LII | $19.2B | 17.8 | |
| 64 | JBTM | $7.2B | 17.8 | |
| 65 | ESE | $8.3B | 18.0 | |
| 66 | ITW | $78.1B | 18.2 | |
| 67 | CMI | $91.7B | 18.4 | |
| 68 | OMCL | $2.1B | 18.5 | |
| 69 | GRC | $2.1B | 18.6 | |
| 70 | HUBB | $25.2B | 18.8 | |
| 71 | SXI | $3.7B | 19.7 | |
| 72 | BHE | $2.9B | 20.4 | |
| 73 | CARR | $57.0B | 20.4 | |
| 74 | SANM | $10.8B | 20.5 | |
| 75 | IBM | $272.8B | 21.4 | |
| 76 | RRX | $13.9B | 21.5 | |
| 77 | TBCH | $255M | 21.5 | |
| 78 | MSI | $69.4B | 21.6 | |
| 79 | IEX | $16.4B | 21.9 | |
| 80 | IR | $30.7B | 21.9 | |
| 81 | VSH | $6.4B | 22.3 | |
| 82 | SPXC | $10.8B | 22.5 | |
| 83 | LYTS | $872M | 22.8 | |
| 84 | PLXS | $6.9B | 22.9 | |
| 85 | Q | $29.5B | 23.2 | |
| 86 | MOG-A | $12.4B | 23.7 | |
| 87 | ENPH | $5.7B | 23.8 | |
| 88 | ON | $35.2B | 23.9 | |
| 89 | ZWS | $7.8B | 24.0 | |
| 90 | ITT | $17.4B | 24.1 | |
| 91 | MITK | $875M | 25.3 | |
| 92 | WDC | $191.5B | 25.7 | |
| 93 | HSAI | $2.4B | 25.7 | |
| 94 | APH | $191.9B | 26.1 | |
| 95 | BC | $5.0B | 26.4 | |
| 96 | DGII | $2.5B | 26.8 | |
| 97 | ETN | $156.4B | 28.0 | |
| 98 | BELFA | $3.1B | 29.1 | |
| 99 | AAPL | $4.7T | 29.4 | |
| 100 | LSE | $74M | 29.5 |
How to turn this ranking into valuation work
Start with the company page
Validate business quality, margins, capital structure, and the current valuation context before relying on a single multiple.
Then validate WACC
A cheap multiple does not guarantee a sensible discount rate. Check cost of capital before finalizing DCF assumptions.
Finish with DCF
Use the matching DCF page to test intrinsic value so multiples, discount rates, and cash-flow assumptions stay connected.
EV/EBITDA Rankings in Other Sectors
Data updated daily · Source: SEC EDGAR, Polygon.io